공지
벳후 이벤트
새 글
새 댓글
레벨 랭킹
포인트 랭킹
  • 최고관리자
    LV. 1
  • 기부벳
    LV. 1
  • 이띠츠
    LV. 1
  • 4
    핀토S
    LV. 1
  • 5
    비상티켓
    LV. 1
  • 6
    김도기
    LV. 1
  • 7
    대구아이린
    LV. 1
  • 8
    맥그리거
    LV. 1
  • 9
    미도파
    LV. 1
  • 10
    김민수
    LV. 1
  • 대부
    12,200 P
  • 핀토S
    9,100 P
  • 정아
    8,300 P
  • 4
    입플맛집
    7,900 P
  • 5
    용흥숙반
    7,200 P
  • 6
    노아태제
    7,100 P
  • 7
    세육용안
    7,100 P
  • 8
    엄명옥공
    7,100 P
  • 9
    장장어추
    7,100 P
  • 10
    롱번채신
    7,100 P

You will Thank Us - Five Tips on Deepseek You have to Know

작성자 정보

컨텐츠 정보

Gc0zgl8bkAAMTtC.jpg DeepSeek represents the newest challenge to OpenAI, which established itself as an business leader with the debut of ChatGPT in 2022. OpenAI has helped push the generative AI trade ahead with its GPT household of models, as well as its o1 class of reasoning models. Mathematical reasoning is a big problem for language fashions due to the complex and structured nature of arithmetic. Explanation: - This benchmark evaluates performance on the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME), a challenging math contest. DeepSeek-R1 Strengths: Math-associated benchmarks (AIME 2024, MATH-500) and software program engineering duties (SWE-bench Verified). Targeted coaching deal with reasoning benchmarks relatively than common NLP tasks. OpenAI o1-1217 Strengths: Competitive programming (Codeforces), general-purpose Q&A (GPQA Diamond), and common data tasks (MMLU). Focused domain experience (math, code, reasoning) somewhat than normal-function NLP tasks. DeepSeek-R1 scores higher by 0.9%, exhibiting it might have better precision and reasoning for advanced math issues. DeepSeek-R1 slightly outperforms OpenAI-o1-1217 by 0.6%, that means it’s marginally higher at solving these kind of math issues. OpenAI-o1-1217 is barely better (by 0.3%), which means it may have a slight advantage in dealing with algorithmic and coding challenges. OpenAI-o1-1217 is 1% better, that means it might need a broader or deeper understanding of numerous subjects. Explanation: - MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) tests the model’s common knowledge throughout subjects like history, science, and social studies.


Explanation: - This benchmark evaluates the model’s performance in resolving software program engineering duties. Explanation: - GPQA Diamond assesses a model’s means to reply advanced normal-purpose questions. Explanation: - Codeforces is a well-liked competitive programming platform, and percentile ranking exhibits how well the models carry out compared to others. Explanation: - This benchmark measures math downside-solving skills throughout a wide range of topics. The mannequin was examined across a number of of probably the most difficult math and programming benchmarks, showing main advances in deep reasoning. The two models perform fairly similarly general, with DeepSeek-R1 leading in math and software tasks, while OpenAI o1-1217 excels on the whole knowledge and drawback-solving. DeepSeek Chat has two variants of 7B and 67B parameters, that are trained on a dataset of two trillion tokens, says the maker. This high level of performance is complemented by accessibility; DeepSeek R1 is free to use on the DeepSeek chat platform and provides reasonably priced API pricing. DeepSeek-R1 has a slight 0.3% advantage, indicating an identical degree of coding proficiency with a small lead. However, censorship is there on the app level and might simply be bypassed by some cryptic prompting like the above instance.


That mixture of performance and lower price helped DeepSeek's AI assistant change into essentially the most-downloaded free app on Apple's App Store when it was released in the US.

댓글 0
전체 메뉴